Court directs respondent to review lookout notice, communicate decision; petitioner can submit communication; writ petition disposed. The court directed the first respondent to review the necessity of maintaining the lookout notice and to communicate a decision within two weeks if ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Court directs respondent to review lookout notice, communicate decision; petitioner can submit communication; writ petition disposed.
The court directed the first respondent to review the necessity of maintaining the lookout notice and to communicate a decision within two weeks if satisfied with the petitioner's cooperation. The petitioner was allowed to submit relevant communication to the respondents for consideration. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly, with the directive for the respondents to pass orders within the specified timeframe.
Issues: Challenge to lookout notice as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India.
In this case, the petitioner challenged the lookout notice issued by the respondents, alleging it to be illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner raised factual and legal objections against the impugned notice. The respondents justified the notice, stating that it was necessary due to the petitioner's lack of cooperation in the investigation into offenses. However, the petitioner contended that they had been law-abiding and cooperative in all matters. The court was tasked with evaluating the petitioner's conduct in cooperating with the investigation and determining the validity of the lookout circulars. The court observed that if the petitioner continued to cooperate with the investigation, the respondents were willing to revoke the lookout circular. The court directed the first respondent to review the necessity of maintaining the lookout notice and to communicate a decision within two weeks if satisfied with the petitioner's cooperation. The petitioner was allowed to submit relevant communication to the respondents for consideration. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly, with the directive for the respondents to pass orders within the specified timeframe.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
TaxTMI 
