<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 105 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381028</link>
    <description>The court directed the first respondent to review the necessity of maintaining the lookout notice and to communicate a decision within two weeks if satisfied with the petitioner&#039;s cooperation. The petitioner was allowed to submit relevant communication to the respondents for consideration. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly, with the directive for the respondents to pass orders within the specified timeframe.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2019 17:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=573745" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 105 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381028</link>
      <description>The court directed the first respondent to review the necessity of maintaining the lookout notice and to communicate a decision within two weeks if satisfied with the petitioner&#039;s cooperation. The petitioner was allowed to submit relevant communication to the respondents for consideration. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly, with the directive for the respondents to pass orders within the specified timeframe.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381028</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>