Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit on inputs is inadmissible when the final products are cleared under Chapter X on the strength of CT 2 certificate without payment of duty, and whether Rule 57C of the Central Excise Rules applies only to wholly exempt goods or goods chargeable to nil rate of duty.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the controversy was already settled by earlier decisions holding that clearance under Chapter X or under bond is not equivalent to clearance of goods wholly exempt from duty or goods chargeable to nil rate of duty. On that basis, the rule relied upon by the Revenue was held inapplicable to such clearances, and the denial of credit could not be sustained.
Conclusion: Rule 57C of the Central Excise Rules did not apply to the respondents' clearances under Chapter X, and the Modvat credit was admissible.