Modvat credit under Rule 57C was not barred where inputs fed intermediate goods cleared duty-free for export use.

Modvat credit was considered in relation to inputs used to make intermediate goods cleared without payment of duty under Rule 191BB for further use in exported final products. The text states that such removal without payment of duty is distinct from a true exemption or nil-rate clearance, so Rule 57C disqualification did not apply. Earlier authority and administrative instructions under the analogous Rule 56A supported this distinction, and the later amendment covering free trade zone and 100 per cent export-oriented unit clearances did not alter the position because those cases involved actual exemptions. A trade notice could not override the statutory scheme, and the subsequent export use of the goods did not change the character of the clearance. Modvat credit therefore could not be denied on that basis.

---

---

Issues: Whether Modvat credit was disallowable under Rule 57C of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 on inputs used in the manufacture of intermediate goods cleared without payment of duty under Rule 191BB and Notification No. 33/90-C.E. (N.T.) dated 05-09-1990 for further use in exported final products.

Analysis: The decisive question was whether goods cleared without payment of duty under Rule 191BB could be treated as goods exempted from the whole of duty or chargeable to nil rate of duty for the purpose of Rule 57C. The expression "removal without payment of duty" was held to be distinct from a true exemption granted by notification. The reasoning was supported by the distinction drawn in earlier authority and by administrative instructions interpreting the analogous Rule 56A provision, which treated export under bond as outside the scope of exemption-based disqualification. The later amendment to Rule 57C for free trade zone and 100 per cent export-oriented unit clearances did not alter this position, because those cases involved actual exemptions, unlike the present clearance under Rule 191BB. The Collectorate trade notice could not override the statutory scheme, and the subsequent use of the intermediate goods in exported final products did not change the character of the clearance from duty-free removal to exemption.

Conclusion: Rule 57C was not attracted, and Modvat credit could not be denied on that ground.

---