Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was liable to reverse 8% of the price under Rule 57-CC of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 when the goods were supplied to a buyer availing exemption under Notification No. 6/2000 and the Chapter X procedure had been followed.
Analysis: Rule 57-CC applies where inputs are used in the manufacture of both duty-paid final products and final products exempt from duty or chargeable to nil rate of duty. The buyer's product was exempt under Notification No. 6/2000, and the requirement of following Chapter X procedure in the notification was only a safeguard for availing the exemption. That procedural requirement did not convert the transaction into one governed by Chapter X remission so as to take it outside Rule 57-CC. Since the assessee's goods were used in relation to the manufacture of an exempt product, the statutory condition for reversal of credit was attracted.
Conclusion: The assessee was liable under Rule 57-CC and was not entitled to refund of the modvat credit reversed; the answer was against the assessee.