Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit on inputs could be denied on the ground that the final products were cleared without payment of duty under Notification No. 49/94-C.E. (N.T.), so as to attract Rule 57-C of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: Rule 57-C barred credit only where the final products were exempt from the whole of duty or chargeable to nil rate of duty. The final goods in question were cleared under Notification No. 49/94-C.E. (N.T.), issued under Rule 13 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, which permitted removal of excisable goods without payment of duty for export-related purposes. Such clearances were not treated as clearances under an exemption notification issued under Section 5A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, nor did they make the final products nil-rated. The Tribunal applied the settled view that goods cleared under Rule 13 for export do not become wholly exempt or chargeable to nil duty for the purpose of Rule 57-C.
Conclusion: Modvat credit could not be denied, and Rule 57-C was inapplicable to the clearances made under the notification.
Ratio Decidendi: Goods cleared without payment of duty under Rule 13 for export-related purposes are not treated as exempted goods or goods chargeable to nil rate of duty for applying Rule 57-C.