Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Revenue's appeal was liable to be dismissed under the litigation policy on the ground that the disputed duty was below the prescribed monetary limit.
Analysis: The disputed duty involved was below Rs. 10 lakhs, the monetary threshold notified by the Government in the cited circulars governing departmental appeals. Since the case fell within the prohibition against pursuing appeals below the prescribed limit, the Tribunal held that the appeal could not be entertained on merits.
Conclusion: The appeal was dismissed under the litigation policy and the connected stay petition was disposed of.
Final Conclusion: The departmental appeal did not survive because the tax effect was below the applicable monetary threshold fixed for litigation management.
Ratio Decidendi: Departmental appeals are not to be pursued where the disputed tax effect is below the monetary limit prescribed under the applicable litigation policy.