<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 332 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379604</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Miscellaneous Application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal before it but ultimately dismissed the appeal due to the disputed duty amount falling below the specified monetary limit of Rs. 10 lakhs as per Government Circulars. The decision was in line with the Litigation Policy, resulting in the disposal of the Stay Petition as well.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2019 05:47:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569806" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 332 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379604</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Miscellaneous Application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal before it but ultimately dismissed the appeal due to the disputed duty amount falling below the specified monetary limit of Rs. 10 lakhs as per Government Circulars. The decision was in line with the Litigation Policy, resulting in the disposal of the Stay Petition as well.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379604</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>