Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether imported second-hand digital multifunction printing and copying machines could be released provisionally when the importer had not obtained the required DGFT authorisation or BIS registration and the goods had only been warehoused under Section 49 of the Customs Act, 1962.
Analysis: The import was subject to independent compliance with the Foreign Trade Policy restriction, the compulsory registration requirement under the MeitY order, and the waste-management procedures. The importer had complied only with the environmental procedure requirements and had not obtained the essential authorisation/import licence or BIS certificate. Section 110A of the Customs Act, 1962 was held inapplicable because it operates only after seizure under Section 110, whereas the goods had merely been warehoused under Section 49 at the importer's request. The earlier decision relied on by the importer was distinguished because it involved seized goods and a materially different factual setting. The direction for provisional release on bond and security was therefore found unsustainable.
Conclusion: The request for provisional clearance was rejected and the order directing release of the goods on bond and security was set aside.