TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeal success: Goods seized unlawfully returned to appellants under Customs Act.</h1> <h3>ESI. LTD. Versus UNION OF INDIA</h3> ESI. LTD. Versus UNION OF INDIA - 2003 (156) E.L.T. 344 (Cal.) Issues Involved:1. Legality of the detention and seizure of goods u/s 110(1) of the Customs Act, 1962.2. Validity of the show cause notice issued u/s 124 of the Customs Act, 1962.3. Entitlement of the appellants to the return of the seized goods u/s 110(2) of the Customs Act, 1962.Summary:1. Legality of the detention and seizure of goods u/s 110(1) of the Customs Act, 1962:The appellants imported raw silk yarn which was detained and seized by the Customs authorities on 9th November, 2000. The appellants argued that the detention on 9th November, 2000, amounted to seizure as the rooms containing the goods were sealed by the Customs Officers on 22nd November, 2000, thereby taking dominion over the goods out of the appellants' hands. The respondents contended that the goods were merely detained on 9th November, 2000, and actually seized on 1st March, 2001.2. Validity of the show cause notice issued u/s 124 of the Customs Act, 1962:The appellants claimed that the show cause notice issued on 30th July, 2001, was beyond the statutory period of six months from the date of seizure, as required u/s 124 of the Customs Act. The respondents argued that the notice was within the statutory period since the actual seizure occurred on 1st March, 2001.3. Entitlement of the appellants to the return of the seized goods u/s 110(2) of the Customs Act, 1962:The Court held that the detention on 9th November, 2000, followed by the sealing of the rooms on 22nd November, 2000, amounted to seizure. Since the show cause notice was not issued within six months from 22nd November, 2000, the appellants were entitled to the return of the seized goods u/s 110(2) of the Customs Act.Judgment:The appeal was allowed, and the order of the learned Single Judge was set aside. The respondents were directed to release the goods to the appellants forthwith. There was no order as to costs. The prayer for stay was refused.
TaxTMI 