Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Miscellaneous Application seeking rectification was maintainable on the ground that Circular No. 12/2014-Cus dated 17.11.2014 was not considered, and whether such omission amounted to a mistake apparent from the record.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the earlier final order had been passed on the merits of the dispute and had already held the refund claim to be inadmissible under the Customs Act, 1962 despite being filed within time. The plea that the circular was not mentioned or considered did not disclose any apparent error in the order. The decisions cited were found inapplicable to the facts.
Conclusion: The Miscellaneous Application did not disclose any mistake apparent from the record and was rejected.