Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the challenge to the assessment on the ground of limitation under section 25(1) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act survived independently of the earlier batch decision, and whether the writ petition required fresh consideration on that question.
Analysis: The assessment was assailed primarily as being beyond the limitation period prescribed under section 25(1) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act. The earlier dismissal of the writ petition had proceeded on the footing that the matter was covered by a prior batch of cases, but the limited question of time bar under the KVAT Act was not shown to have been specifically dealt with there. In those circumstances, the matter required reconsideration by the single judge on the limitation issue.
Conclusion: The challenge on limitation was not finally concluded against the appellant, and the matter was remitted for fresh decision on that issue.