<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 465 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378021</link>
    <description>A challenge to a KVAT assessment as time-barred under section 25(1) remained open because the earlier writ dismissal had not specifically addressed the limitation question. The Kerala High Court noted that the prior batch decision was relied on to dispose of the petition, but the distinct issue of whether the assessment was beyond the statutory period had not been shown to have been decided. The matter was therefore remitted for fresh consideration by the single judge on limitation, leaving the challenge on that ground not finally concluded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2019 09:28:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=566000" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 465 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378021</link>
      <description>A challenge to a KVAT assessment as time-barred under section 25(1) remained open because the earlier writ dismissal had not specifically addressed the limitation question. The Kerala High Court noted that the prior batch decision was relied on to dispose of the petition, but the distinct issue of whether the assessment was beyond the statutory period had not been shown to have been decided. The matter was therefore remitted for fresh consideration by the single judge on limitation, leaving the challenge on that ground not finally concluded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378021</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>