<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 465 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378021</link>
    <description>The writ appeal was allowed, setting aside the impugned judgment in the writ petition. The writ petition was restored on the court&#039;s files for fresh consideration by a single judge, specifically addressing the challenge against the assessment concerning the limitation bar under section 25(1) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act. Any interim order existing at the time of the writ petition&#039;s dismissal would remain in force until further decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2019 09:28:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=566000" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 465 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378021</link>
      <description>The writ appeal was allowed, setting aside the impugned judgment in the writ petition. The writ petition was restored on the court&#039;s files for fresh consideration by a single judge, specifically addressing the challenge against the assessment concerning the limitation bar under section 25(1) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act. Any interim order existing at the time of the writ petition&#039;s dismissal would remain in force until further decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378021</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>