Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, after a limited remand by the Tribunal, the Assessing Authority could reopen issues already decided by the Tribunal and attained finality, while also examining fresh matters not covered by the remand.
Analysis: The Tribunal had conclusively decided the assessee's entitlement to concessional treatment on Forms-D, the admissibility of additional Forms-C, D and F filed in appeal, and had disapproved the rejection of books of accounts for the relevant years. Those findings bound the Assessing Authority in the remand proceedings and could not be re-agitated. At the same time, the power of the Assessing Authority in remand was not completely curtailed: subject to the Tribunal's directions and binding findings, fresh or untouched issues could still be examined in accordance with law.
Conclusion: The notices were not quashed in full, but the Assessing Authority was restrained from reopening issues already decided by the Tribunal and attaining finality.
Final Conclusion: The remand proceedings may continue only within the bounds of the Tribunal's final findings, and the Assessing Authority cannot travel beyond those findings to reconsider settled matters.
Ratio Decidendi: In remand proceedings, the lower authority remains bound by issues conclusively decided by the appellate authority, but may examine only such fresh matters as are not covered by the binding remand directions or final findings.