Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an application for advance ruling is admissible when proceedings under the GST law are already pending against the applicant on the same question.
Analysis: The first proviso to section 98(2) bars admission of an application where the question raised is already pending or decided in any proceedings in the applicant's case under the GST law. Proceedings initiated under section 71 were treated as proceedings under the Act, and the records showed that such proceedings had commenced before the hearing on admissibility. As the subject matter of those proceedings was the same question for which ruling was sought, the statutory bar applied.
Conclusion: The application was not admissible and could not be admitted.