<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1007 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS WEST BENGAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375380</link>
    <description>An advance ruling application is barred where the same question is already pending in proceedings under the GST law in the applicant&#039;s case. Proceedings initiated under section 71 were treated as proceedings under the Act, and because they had commenced before the admissibility hearing on the identical issue, the statutory prohibition in the first proviso to section 98(2) applied. The application was therefore not admissible and could not be admitted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2025 13:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=558512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1007 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS WEST BENGAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375380</link>
      <description>An advance ruling application is barred where the same question is already pending in proceedings under the GST law in the applicant&#039;s case. Proceedings initiated under section 71 were treated as proceedings under the Act, and because they had commenced before the admissibility hearing on the identical issue, the statutory prohibition in the first proviso to section 98(2) applied. The application was therefore not admissible and could not be admitted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375380</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>