Section 12A registration refused where doubtful dissolution clause and private control raised concerns over charitable genuineness.

Registration under section 12A was refused because the trust's original memorandum contained no dissolution clause and the later amendment was considered doubtful. The authorities found that the trust's representation of wholly government-funded, ex officio management did not match the material on record, as the governing body had not been extended for years and effective control had shifted to private individuals. On those facts, the apprehension that trust assets could inure to private benefit on dissolution was treated as justified, and the trust's claimed charitable genuineness was also in doubt. The refusal of registration was therefore upheld.

---

---

Issues: Whether registration under section 12A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could be granted to the trust when the absence and later amendment of the dissolution clause, the alleged shift of control from government officials to private persons, and the surrounding facts cast doubt on the genuineness of the trust's objects.

Analysis: The trust's registration application was rejected because the original memorandum contained no dissolution clause and the later amendment was found doubtful. The trust had represented that it was wholly government-funded and managed through an ex officio governing body headed by the Chief Minister, but the material showed that the term of the governing body had not been extended for years and that control had effectively passed to private individuals. In these circumstances, the apprehension that the assets could inure to private benefit on dissolution was treated as justified, and the facts also raised doubt about the genuineness of the trust's claimed charitable functioning.

Conclusion: Registration under section 12A was rightly refused, and the appeal failed.

---