<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1552 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372783</link>
    <description>Registration under section 12A was refused because the trust&#039;s original memorandum contained no dissolution clause and the later amendment was considered doubtful. The authorities found that the trust&#039;s representation of wholly government-funded, ex officio management did not match the material on record, as the governing body had not been extended for years and effective control had shifted to private individuals. On those facts, the apprehension that trust assets could inure to private benefit on dissolution was treated as justified, and the trust&#039;s claimed charitable genuineness was also in doubt. The refusal of registration was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2018 11:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=549966" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1552 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372783</link>
      <description>Registration under section 12A was refused because the trust&#039;s original memorandum contained no dissolution clause and the later amendment was considered doubtful. The authorities found that the trust&#039;s representation of wholly government-funded, ex officio management did not match the material on record, as the governing body had not been extended for years and effective control had shifted to private individuals. On those facts, the apprehension that trust assets could inure to private benefit on dissolution was treated as justified, and the trust&#039;s claimed charitable genuineness was also in doubt. The refusal of registration was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>