Principal function test governs tariff classification of composite beverage coolers; non-automatic dispensing machines fall within the specific vending heading.

A composite beverage cooler was classified by its principal and specifically covered function, not by a broader storage-and-display description. The product literature showed limited storage capacity, inverted bottle placement, and tap-operated beverage dispensing, so the dispensing function was treated as dominant. Because the tariff entry for vending machines expressly covered non-automatic dispensing machines, the absence of coin-operated or fully automatic features did not prevent classification under CTH 8418 69 30. The alternative claim under CTH 8418 50 00 was rejected as the specific entry prevailed over a residuary or broader description.

---

---

Issues: Whether the imported beverage cooler was correctly classifiable under CTH 8418 50 00 as furniture for storage and display incorporating refrigerating equipment, or under CTH 8418 69 30 as a vending machine other than an automatic vending machine.

Analysis: The product literature showed that the machine was not designed for mere storage and display. It had a small storage capacity, fixed bottles in an inverted position, and tap-triggered outlets for dispensing beverages. The relevant classification depended on the machine's additional and predominant function beyond cooling. A machine used for more than one purpose is to be classified according to its principal purpose. On that basis, the dispensing function was held to be the dominant feature. The entry under CTH 8418 69 30 expressly covered vending machines other than automatic vending machines, so the absence of a coin-operated or fully automatic mechanism did not exclude the goods from that heading. The alternative residuary claim was rejected because the specific entry covered the goods.

Conclusion: The imported goods were correctly classifiable under CTH 8418 69 30, and not under CTH 8418 50 00.

Final Conclusion: The classification adopted by the Revenue was affirmed, and the importer's appeals failed.

Ratio Decidendi: For tariff classification of a composite machine, the heading corresponding to its principal and specifically covered function prevails over a broader storage-or-display description, and an express entry for vending machines includes non-automatic dispensing machines.

---