E-commerce Operator Liable for GST on Transportation Services

The Appellate Authority upheld the decision that the Appellant, an e-commerce operator, is liable to pay GST on transportation services provided through its platform. The appeal by M/s. OPTA Cabs Pvt. Ltd. was dismissed, confirming their obligation to pay GST on passenger transportation services facilitated via their IT platform.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Whether the Appellant is an e-commerce operator under the CGST Act, 2017.
2. Whether GST is leviable on the amounts billed by the Appellant on behalf of the taxi operators for the services provided in the nature of transportation of passengers.
3. Interpretation of Section 9(5) of the CGST Act, 2017 and Notification No. 17/2017 - Central Tax (Rate) dated 28th June 2017.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Whether the Appellant is an e-commerce operator under the CGST Act, 2017:
The Appellant, M/s. OPTA Cabs Pvt. Ltd., operates a taxi aggregation service through an IT platform, connecting customers and taxi drivers. The Appellant argued that it only provides an IT platform service and does not intercede in the service provision by the taxi drivers. According to Section 2(45) of the CGST Act, 2017, an "electronic commerce operator" means any person who owns, operates, or manages a digital or electronic facility or platform for electronic commerce. The Appellate Authority found that the Appellant owns and operates the IT platform for the supply of transportation services over a digital network, thereby qualifying as an "electronic commerce operator."

2. Whether GST is leviable on the amounts billed by the Appellant on behalf of the taxi operators for the services provided in the nature of transportation of passengers:
The Appellant contended that it does not receive any payment from customers, as payments are made directly to the taxi drivers. However, the Appellate Authority noted that under Section 9(5) of the CGST Act, 2017, the liability to pay tax on certain notified services, including transportation of passengers, is shifted to the e-commerce operator. The Appellant's platform facilitates the supply of transportation services, and hence, the Appellant is liable to pay GST on these services, regardless of whether the payment is made directly to the taxi driver or not.

3. Interpretation of Section 9(5) of the CGST Act, 2017 and Notification No. 17/2017 - Central Tax (Rate) dated 28th June 2017:
Section 9(5) of the CGST Act, 2017, states that the Government may specify categories of services for which the tax on intra-State supplies shall be paid by the electronic commerce operator if such services are supplied through it. Notification No. 17/2017 - Central Tax (Rate) dated 28th June 2017 includes transportation of passengers by a radio-taxi, motorcab, maxicab, and motor cycle as such services. The Appellant argued that the services are only "booked" and not "supplied" through its platform. However, the Appellate Authority clarified that the booking of a taxi ride through the Appellant's platform is an integral part of the supply chain, making the Appellant liable for GST under Section 9(5) as if it is the supplier.

Conclusion:
The Appellate Authority upheld the Advance Ruling Authority's decision that the Appellant, as an e-commerce operator, is liable to pay GST on the services of transportation of passengers supplied through its platform. The appeal filed by M/s. OPTA Cabs Pvt. Ltd. was dismissed on all accounts.

---