Tribunal affirms charitable status for tax exemption under Income Tax Act

The tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decision that the assessee's activities were charitable and not commercial, thus eligible for exemption under Sections 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act. It found that the dominant object of the assessee was charitable, and any incidental commercial activity did not negate its charitable purpose. The tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal, affirming that the assessee's activities were not hit by the proviso to Section 2(15).

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Whether the activities of the assessee fall under the last limb of Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act as commercial activities.
2. Whether the assessee is eligible for exemption under Sections 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act.

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Commercial Activities under Section 2(15)
The primary contention of the revenue was that the assessee’s activities are commercial in nature, falling under the last limb of Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act, which pertains to "advancement of any other object of general public utility." The assessing officer (AO) noted that the assessee, a registered society, was generating income through fees and subscriptions amounting to Rs. 4.37 crores and grants/subsidies of Rs. 6 crores. The AO argued that the assessee was carrying on business activities as it charged fees, accumulated substantial funds, and generated a surplus of Rs. 2.84 crores. Consequently, the AO denied the exemption under Sections 11 and 12, determining the total income at Rs. 7.91 crores.

Issue 2: Eligibility for Exemption under Sections 11 and 12
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] examined the objectives and activities of the assessee, which included promoting accreditation systems for laboratories, ensuring measurement standards, and enhancing quality and accuracy in testing and calibration. The CIT(A) concluded that the assessee’s activities were charitable and not commercial, relying on the Delhi High Court’s decision in ICAI vs DGIT (Exemption). The CIT(A) emphasized that the amendment to Section 2(15) targets entities where business is the main activity, not incidental to charitable activities.

Tribunal's Findings:
The tribunal carefully reviewed the arguments and the orders of the lower authorities. It noted that the assessee is an autonomous society formed by the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India, and is registered under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal agreed with the CIT(A) that the assessee’s activities were spread across India for the public benefit and were conducted in a non-discriminatory manner. The tribunal highlighted the CIT(A)’s detailed consideration of the assessee’s objectives and activities, which aligned with the charitable purpose of promoting quality and accuracy in laboratory testing and calibration.

The tribunal also referenced the legislative intent behind the amendment to Section 2(15), as clarified in the Budget Speech, which aimed to exclude entities carrying on regular trade, commerce, or business from claiming charitable status. However, it emphasized that the dominant object of the assessee was charitable, and any incidental commercial activity did not negate its charitable purpose.

Conclusion:
The tribunal found no infirmity in the CIT(A)’s order, which was consistent with the jurisdictional High Court’s decision in ICAI vs DGIT (Exemption). It concluded that the assessee’s activities were not hit by the proviso to Section 2(15) and confirmed the CIT(A)’s finding that the assessee is eligible for exemption under Sections 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, the appeal of the revenue was dismissed.

Order:
The appeal of the learned assessing officer is dismissed. The order was pronounced in the open court on 28/11/2018.

---