Transfer pricing limits on routed funds: back-to-back film distribution payments through an associated enterprise were not an international transaction.

Amounts routed through an associated enterprise for acquisition of film distribution rights were treated as part of a single back-to-back commercial arrangement, not as financing or lending in substance. The enterprise acted only as a conduit, with funds immediately remitted to the third party and later routed back without any meaningful retention. On these facts, the Explanation to Section 92B, including references to capital financing, borrowings, advances, payments and receivables, was held not to apply. The arrangement did not result in diversion of income or any taxable benefit to the associated enterprise, so Chapter X transfer pricing provisions were not attracted.

---

---

Issues: Whether amounts routed through an associated enterprise for acquisition of film distribution rights constituted an international transaction attracting Chapter X of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Analysis: The arrangement was found to be a single integrated business transaction entered into for acquiring distributorship rights of films. The associated enterprise acted only as a conduit under back-to-back agreements with the assessee and the third party. The amounts advanced were immediately remitted to the third party and, on refund, were likewise routed back without the associated enterprise retaining them for any meaningful period. On these facts, the explanation to Section 92B, including capital financing, borrowings, advances, payments and receivables, was held not to cover the transaction. The arrangement did not result in any diversion of income to the associated enterprise and did not involve financing or lending in substance.

Conclusion: The transaction did not constitute an international transaction and Chapter X was not attracted. The Revenue's appeal failed.

Final Conclusion: The addition under transfer pricing provisions was held unsustainable because the money merely passed through the associated enterprise as part of a genuine commercial arrangement and no taxable benefit or income arose to that enterprise.

Ratio Decidendi: For Chapter X to apply, there must be a real international transaction between associated enterprises that gives rise to income, benefit, or a transfer pricing consequence; mere routing of funds through an associated enterprise in a bona fide back-to-back commercial arrangement does not suffice.

---