Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2018 (11) TMI 996 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal sets aside order, remands for verification, directs AO to provide material, opportunity for assessee. The tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer for further verification, directing the AO to furnish the ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal sets aside order, remands for verification, directs AO to provide material, opportunity for assessee.

                            The tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer for further verification, directing the AO to furnish the material collected to the assessee and provide a reasonable opportunity for the assessee to present her case. Both appeals were allowed for statistical purposes.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Applicability of Section 68 of the Income Tax Act.
                            2. Verification of the genuineness, creditworthiness, and identity of M/s Pranav Sports Academy Pvt. Ltd.
                            3. Alleged violation of the principles of natural justice.
                            4. Appropriate treatment of the forfeited advance amount under the Income Tax Act.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Applicability of Section 68 of the Income Tax Act:

                            The assessee contended that Section 68 of the Act, which deals with unexplained cash credits, had no application in this case because the income was derived from salary and house property, not from business, and no books of account were maintained. The tribunal agreed, noting that Section 68 applies to sums found credited in the books of the assessee maintained for the previous year, which was not applicable here. The tribunal also noted that Section 69, which deals with unexplained investments, was not applicable as the necessary ingredients for its applicability were missing. The tribunal found strength in the argument that Section 51, which deals with advance money received and retained upon the failure of negotiations for the transfer of a capital asset, was the appropriate provision, and the assessee had complied with it.

                            2. Verification of the genuineness, creditworthiness, and identity of M/s Pranav Sports Academy Pvt. Ltd.:

                            The Principal Commissioner of Income-tax (PCIT) had directed the Assessing Officer (A.O.) to verify the genuineness, creditworthiness, and identity of M/s Pranav Sports Academy Pvt. Ltd., which had allegedly paid the forfeited advance amount. The A.O. conducted an inquiry and concluded that M/s Pranav Sports Academy was a bogus company based on a report from an Income-tax Inspector. The tribunal noted that the A.O. did not confront the assessee with the evidence collected, including the financials of M/s Pranav Sports Academy and the Inspector's report, thereby violating the principles of natural justice.

                            3. Alleged violation of the principles of natural justice:

                            The assessee argued that the A.O. violated the principles of natural justice by relying on evidence collected behind the assessee's back without providing an opportunity to respond. The tribunal agreed, emphasizing that the material gathered should have been shared with the assessee to allow for a fair opportunity to explain. The tribunal found that the A.O.'s conclusions were based on material not disclosed to the assessee, leading to a violation of natural justice.

                            4. Appropriate treatment of the forfeited advance amount under the Income Tax Act:

                            The tribunal observed that the assessee had declared the entire sale consideration, including the forfeited advance amount, in the computation of income. The Revenue's concern was that the assessee might have routed unaccounted money through this transaction. The tribunal found that the entire transaction, including the forfeiture of the advance and the subsequent sale at a lower price, raised suspicions. However, it noted that the Revenue had inconsistently accepted the transaction in the hands of the assessee's husband while disputing it for the assessee. The tribunal concluded that the matter required further verification by the A.O. after providing the assessee with the material collected and allowing an opportunity to respond.

                            Conclusion:

                            The tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the A.O. for further verification, directing the A.O. to furnish the material collected to the assessee and provide a reasonable opportunity for the assessee to present her case. Both appeals were allowed for statistical purposes. The decision was pronounced on November 13, 2018.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found