Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on an amalgamation sanctioned under the Companies Act, the capital assets transferred to the transferee company became its property by succession or devolution so as to attract section 12B(3) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 and entitle the assessee to substitute the fair market value as on 1 January 1954.
Analysis: The transfer of the undertaking and its assets pursuant to a court-sanctioned amalgamation under section 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 was treated as a transfer by operation of law. Section 12B of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 governs transfer of capital assets, and its sub-section (3) applies where the asset becomes the property of the assessee by succession, inheritance or devolution. The Court held that whether the entire business was transferred was not decisive; the material question was whether the capital assets passed by succession or devolution. On the unchallenged finding that the business was taken over and continued, the transfer was held to be a clear case of devolution.
Conclusion: The answer was in the affirmative and in favour of the assessee; section 12B(3) applied and the assessee was entitled to substitute the fair market value as on 1 January 1954.
Ratio Decidendi: A transfer of capital assets pursuant to a court-sanctioned amalgamation constitutes devolution by operation of law for the purposes of section 12B(3) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 where the assets are taken over and the business is continued.