Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondent was entitled to Small Scale Industry exemption under Notification No. 8/2003-C.E. dated 01.03.2003 notwithstanding use of another person's brand name, on the ground that its unit was located in a rural area.
Analysis: The relevant notification defined "rural area" by reference to a village as reflected in land revenue records, excluding areas within municipal bodies, cantonments, notified urban areas, and similar local limits. The respondent's unit was shown to be in Bhugaon village, and the records indicated payment of property tax to the local Gram Panchayat under Section 129(1) of the Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958. The statutory scheme under Section 2 of that Act extended to villages outside municipal and cantonment limits, which supported the finding that the unit was situated in a rural area. The fact that the village was referred to under the Urban Land Ceiling Act did not displace the specific definition of "rural area" in the exemption notification. No contrary evidence was produced by Revenue to rebut the factual finding that the unit fell within the notified rural area.
Conclusion: The respondent was eligible for the SSI exemption, and the demand was not sustainable.