<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 726 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370383</link>
    <description>Eligibility for Small Scale Industry exemption under Notification No. 8/2003-C.E. turned on whether the unit was located in a rural area, even though another person&#039;s brand name was used. The notification defined &quot;rural area&quot; by reference to village records and excluded municipal, cantonment, notified urban and similar local limits. The unit was shown in Bhugaon village, with property tax paid to the Gram Panchayat and the local statutory framework supporting village status outside municipal limits. The reference to the village under the Urban Land Ceiling Act did not override the notification&#039;s definition, and Revenue produced no contrary evidence. On that basis, the exemption was available and the demand was not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2018 07:57:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542305" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 726 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370383</link>
      <description>Eligibility for Small Scale Industry exemption under Notification No. 8/2003-C.E. turned on whether the unit was located in a rural area, even though another person&#039;s brand name was used. The notification defined &quot;rural area&quot; by reference to village records and excluded municipal, cantonment, notified urban and similar local limits. The unit was shown in Bhugaon village, with property tax paid to the Gram Panchayat and the local statutory framework supporting village status outside municipal limits. The reference to the village under the Urban Land Ceiling Act did not override the notification&#039;s definition, and Revenue produced no contrary evidence. On that basis, the exemption was available and the demand was not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370383</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>