Tribunal overturns penalty under Rule 25 due to lack of evidence.

The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed on the appellant under Rule 25, as it was not supported by the evidence or the provisions of the Central Excise Rules, 2002.

---

---

Issues:
Imposition of penalty under Rule 25 instead of Rule 26 on the appellant.

Analysis:
The case involved the appellant selling mosquito repellent coils under their brand name, manufactured by supporting manufacturers. A show cause notice was issued to one of the manufacturers for wrongly availing exemption benefits by using the appellant's brand name. The appellant, although not the manufacturer, paid excise duty and interest upon being informed of the duty liability. Subsequently, a show cause notice was issued to the manufacturer seeking duty payment and proposing penalties. Seized coils were also involved, with penalties proposed on the director and the appellant under Central Excise Rules, 2002.

The original authority confirmed demands, confiscated goods, and imposed penalties, with a discrepancy in the penalty rule applied to the appellant. The appellant argued against the penalty imposition under Rule 25, as the notice proposed Rule 26. The appellant contended they were not involved in the alleged activities justifying Rule 26 penalty. The first appellate authority upheld the penalty under Rule 25, citing a typographical error in the original order.

The Tribunal analyzed the penalty imposition discrepancy and found the appellant was not given a chance to defend against Rule 25 penalty imposition. The show cause notice did not support the appellant's involvement in activities warranting Rule 26 penalty. The Tribunal concluded the penalty on the appellant should be set aside, as the notice did not establish their liability under Rule 26.

In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed on the appellant under Rule 25, as it was not supported by the evidence or the provisions of the Central Excise Rules, 2002.

This detailed analysis of the judgment highlights the key issues, arguments presented, and the Tribunal's decision, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of the legal aspects involved in the case.

---