<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 535 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368569</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed on the appellant under Rule 25, as it was not supported by the evidence or the provisions of the Central Excise Rules, 2002.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2018 06:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=537823" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 535 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368569</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed on the appellant under Rule 25, as it was not supported by the evidence or the provisions of the Central Excise Rules, 2002.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368569</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>