Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether computers, laptops and similar goods used for providing output services qualify as inputs for availing transitional input tax credit under Section 140(2) and Section 140(3) of the Kerala State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. (ii) Whether input tax credit is available on VAT paid goods lying as closing stock on 30 June 2017.
Issue (i): Whether computers, laptops and similar goods used for providing output services qualify as inputs for availing transitional input tax credit under Section 140(2) and Section 140(3) of the Kerala State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
Analysis: The entitlement to transitional credit depended on admissibility both under the existing law and under the GST regime. Goods used as capital assets for providing services were not treated as inputs, and capital goods on which credit was not available under the earlier VAT law could not be carried forward as transitional input credit. Section 140(3) was confined to inputs held in stock and inputs contained in semi-finished or finished goods, and did not extend to the claimed capital goods.
Conclusion: The claim was not allowable; computers, laptops and similar items did not qualify as inputs for transitional input tax credit.
Issue (ii): Whether input tax credit is available on VAT paid goods lying as closing stock on 30 June 2017.
Analysis: Transitional credit on closing stock was available only where the underlying credit was admissible under the existing law and the GST law. Since the goods in question were capital goods used in the course of providing services and no VAT input tax credit was admissible on them, mere physical availability as closing stock did not create eligibility for transitional credit.
Conclusion: Input tax credit on VAT paid goods lying as closing stock was not admissible.
Final Conclusion: The transitional credit claim failed in respect of both the claimed capital goods and the closing stock, leaving the applicant without entitlement to the sought input tax credit.
Ratio Decidendi: Transitional input tax credit is available only for goods whose credit was admissible under the existing law and the GST law, and it does not extend to capital goods used for services where no such credit existed under the earlier regime.