Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2018 (9) TMI 621 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal upholds CIT(A)'s decision on business expenses & Section 14A disallowance The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, allowing business expenses of Rs. 14,67,24,757 as the business was deemed set up, despite not generating ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal upholds CIT(A)'s decision on business expenses & Section 14A disallowance

                            The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, allowing business expenses of Rs. 14,67,24,757 as the business was deemed set up, despite not generating income. Additionally, the disallowance under Section 14A of Rs. 14.13 Lacs was deleted due to the assessee's substantial share capital exceeding investments, leading to no interest disallowance. The Tribunal found no fault in the CIT(A)'s rulings and dismissed the Revenue's appeal on both grounds.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Allowability of business expenses when the business has not been set up.
                            2. Disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            Issue 1: Allowability of Business Expenses

                            The Revenue contested the order of the Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] allowing expenses of Rs. 14,67,24,757/- on the grounds that the business had not been set up. The Assessing Officer (AO) had disallowed these expenses, arguing that the assessee had not started earning income from business activities and, therefore, the expenses could not be treated as business expenditure.

                            The CIT(A) examined Section 3 of the Income Tax Act, which defines "Previous Year" and includes provisions for businesses newly set up. The CIT(A) referred to the Supreme Court's interpretation in CWT vs. Ramaraju Surgical Cotton Mills Ltd., which stated that a business is considered set up when it is ready to discharge the functions for which it is established. The CIT(A) found that the assessee had participated in bidding processes and had been awarded contracts, indicating that the business was set up and ready to function.

                            The CIT(A) also referenced the Karnataka High Court decision in CIT & Anr. VS MFAR Construction Ltd., which held that expenses integral to the business, such as bidding and obtaining contracts, signify the commencement of business. Thus, the CIT(A) allowed the business expenditure, concluding that the assessee's activities met the criteria for being considered set up.

                            Upon appeal, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, noting that the assessee had incurred significant expenses related to staff, sales, administration, and amortization of intangible assets, indicating readiness to commence business. The Tribunal also observed that the assessee had filed a return for the previous year, claiming business expenditure and carrying forward losses, which had not been disputed by the Revenue.

                            The Tribunal cited various judicial pronouncements, including the Bombay High Court's decision in Western Indian Vegetables Products Ltd. v. CIT, which distinguished between setting up and commencement of business. The Tribunal concluded that the assessee had set up its business by participating in bids and obtaining contracts, even if actual business income had not yet been earned. Therefore, the Tribunal found no infirmity in the CIT(A)'s order allowing the business expenses.

                            Issue 2: Disallowance under Section 14A

                            The AO had disallowed Rs. 14.13 Lacs under Section 14A, applying Rule 8D, which includes interest and expense disallowance. The CIT(A) deleted this disallowance, noting that the assessee's Share Capital of Rs. 50 Crores exceeded the investments of Rs. 23.02 Crores, and thus, no interest disallowance was warranted, referencing the Bombay High Court's judgments in CIT Vs. Reliance Utilities Power Ltd. and CIT Vs. HDFC Bank.

                            The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, observing that the assessee had made a suo-moto disallowance of Rs. 2.51 Lacs, computed at 0.5% of average investments yielding exempt income, aligning with the Delhi Tribunal's decision in ACIT Vs. Vireet Investment (P.) Ltd. The Tribunal found no infirmity in the CIT(A)'s order and dismissed the Revenue's appeal on this ground.

                            Conclusion:

                            The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the CIT(A)'s orders on both issues. The business expenses were allowed, as the business was considered set up, and the disallowance under Section 14A was deleted based on the assessee's sufficient own funds and appropriate suo-moto disallowance.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found