Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order was vitiated for denial of personal hearing and violation of the principles of natural justice, warranting setting aside of the order and remand for fresh consideration.
Analysis: The dispute concerned revision of assessment under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, including denial of input tax credit and alleged suppression of turnover. The writ petitioner had submitted written objections, but the grievance was that the authority passed the order without affording a personal hearing to explain the entries in the annual report and to clarify the audit materials. The proviso to Section 27(2) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 requires a reasonable opportunity to show cause before passing an order, and the request for reconsideration after hearing was treated as justified in the facts of the case. The order was therefore found to suffer from breach of natural justice.
Conclusion: The impugned assessment order was set aside and the matter was remitted to the respondent for fresh consideration after affording the writ petitioner a personal hearing.