Tribunal Upholds CIT(A)'s Decision on Deduction under Section 10A

The Tribunal dismissed both the Revenue's appeal and the assessee's Cross Objection. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision allowing the deduction under Section 10A and the deletion of the disallowed interest, following precedents and the jurisdictional High Court's judgments. The order was pronounced in the open court on 4th December 2019.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Withdrawal of Cross Objection by the assessee.
2. Condonation of delay in filing the appeal by the Revenue.
3. Eligibility of the assessee for deduction under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act.
4. Deletion of disallowance of proportionate amount of interest related to amounts diverted to associate concerns.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Withdrawal of Cross Objection by the Assessee:
The assessee's representative indicated that the assessee was not interested in pursuing the Cross Objection in C.O. No.47/Coch/2019. Consequently, the Cross Objection filed by the assessee was dismissed as withdrawn.

2. Condonation of Delay in Filing the Appeal by the Revenue:
There was a delay of 496 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal. The Department filed a condonation petition accompanied by an affidavit explaining that the delay was due to inadvertent delivery of documents to the wrong office. The Tribunal found the reasons advanced by the Department to be bona fide and with sufficient cause. Therefore, the delay was condoned, and the appeal was admitted for adjudication.

3. Eligibility of the Assessee for Deduction under Section 10A:
The core issue was whether the assessee was eligible for deduction under Section 10A despite not filing the required Form No. 56F along with the original return of income. The CIT(A) allowed the deduction, relying on the ITAT Cochin Bench's decision in CWP Taylor Vs DCIT and the Supreme Court's decision in National Thermal Power Corporation Vs. CIT, which clarified that appellate authorities have the power to entertain fresh claims not made in the original return. The CIT(A) verified the facts and concluded that the assessee fulfilled all conditions under Section 10A, including the commencement of manufacturing in a Software Technology Park and compliance with all statutory requirements.

4. Deletion of Disallowance of Proportionate Amount of Interest:
The Assessing Officer had disallowed a proportionate amount of interest on the grounds that the assessee had diverted interest-bearing funds to associate concerns without charging interest. The CIT(A) deleted this disallowance, referencing the ITAT Cochin Bench's decision in the assessee's own case for AY 2008-09, which found that the advances were made in earlier years and were covered by the assessee's reserves and surplus. The Tribunal upheld this view, noting that the facts of the case did not support the Assessing Officer's presumption of fund diversion during the year under consideration.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal dismissed both the Revenue's appeal and the assessee's Cross Objection. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision allowing the deduction under Section 10A and the deletion of the disallowed interest, following precedents and the jurisdictional High Court's judgments. The order was pronounced in the open court on 4th December 2019.

---