1979 (8) TMI 28 - HC - Income Tax

Court remits case for fresh decision on penalty imposition under Income-tax Act

The court remitted the case to the Tribunal for a fresh decision as it found discrepancies in the analysis regarding the penalty imposed on the ... Firm, Penalty Issues:- Whether the Tribunal was right in law in deleting the penalty imposed on the assessee under section 271(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961Rs.Analysis:The judgment concerns a case where penalty proceedings were initiated against an assessee-firm for the late submission of the income tax return. The firm, involved in the exploitation of forests and sale of timber, faced penalty of Rs. 90,600 under section 271(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal, in an appeal, held that the provisions of the Act were applicable, but the provisions of section 189 were not attracted as the business was not discontinued despite the dissolution of the firm. The Tribunal further found that there was no evidence of deliberate delay or contumacious conduct by the assessee, leading to a technical breach of the Act. The court noted that the Tribunal did not address whether the delay was without reasonable cause, a crucial factor for penalty imposition. Consequently, the court remitted the case to the Tribunal for a fresh decision on the appeal in accordance with the law.The court analyzed the provisions of section 189 of the Act, emphasizing that the section applies when a business carried on by a firm is discontinued or the firm is dissolved. The court disagreed with the assessee's argument that dissolution and discontinuance of business were both necessary for section 189 to apply. Referring to a Supreme Court decision, the court clarified that the unambiguous language of the section does not require both conditions to be met. The court highlighted that the Tribunal's alternative findings, suggesting no penalty due to lack of dishonest intention, did not address the crucial aspect of whether the delay was without reasonable cause. The court directed the Tribunal to determine if the delay in filing the return was without reasonable cause before deciding on penalty imposition.In conclusion, the court found discrepancies in the Tribunal's analysis regarding the imposition of the penalty on the assessee-firm. The court emphasized the necessity to determine whether the delay in filing the return was without reasonable cause, a pivotal factor for penalty imposition under section 271(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The case was remitted to the Tribunal for a fresh decision based on a comprehensive assessment of the facts and circumstances to ascertain the presence of reasonable cause for the delay.