Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the value of fringe benefits declared by the assessee at nil was liable to be taxed under Chapter XII-H of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The assessee had declared nil fringe benefits, but the audit report disclosed fringe benefits of Rs. 74,16,789/-. The Tribunal noted that the assessee did not demonstrate that the expenditure fell outside the ambit of fringe benefit taxation, and the issue was stated to be covered against the assessee by an earlier Tribunal decision. The findings of the lower authorities that the assessee was liable to fringe benefit tax were, therefore, upheld.
Conclusion: The fringe benefits were rightly brought to tax and the assessee's challenge failed.