Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest paid on capital provided by the Central Government and the State Government under the Road Transport Corporations Act, 1950 qualified as interest paid in respect of capital borrowed for the purposes of business within section 36(1)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The statutory scheme distinguished between capital "provided" under section 23 and money "borrowed" under section 26. The concept of borrowing imports a lending transaction and an obligation to repay the amount advanced. The Act contained no provision requiring repayment of the capital supplied by the Governments, and the liability to pay interest under section 28 did not convert the capital provided into borrowed capital. The liquidation provision also showed that the governmental contribution was treated as capital subscription rather than a loan.
Conclusion: The interest payment was not allowable under section 36(1)(iii) because the capital supplied under section 23 was not capital borrowed; the answer was against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: Capital supplied under a statutory provision, without an enforceable obligation of repayment, is not "capital borrowed" for the purpose of claiming interest deduction under section 36(1)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.