Review jurisdiction under CPC is limited to patent error on the record, not rehearing or rearguing the merits.

Review jurisdiction under Section 114 and Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is narrow and cannot be used as an appeal in disguise. A review lies only where there is a patent, self-evident error on the face of the record requiring no elaborate reasoning, not for rehearing the matter or reappreciation of evidence. On the stated facts, no such apparent error was shown in the earlier order, and the petition was treated as an attempt to reargue the decided issue. The review petition was therefore not maintainable on the ground urged and was liable to be dismissed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the review petition disclosed any error apparent on the face of the record or any other sufficient ground warranting interference with the earlier order.

Analysis: The scope of review is confined by Section 114 and Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. A review is not an appeal in disguise and cannot be used for rehearing the matter, reappreciation of evidence, or correction of an allegedly erroneous view on merits. Only a patent, self-evident error requiring no elaborate reasoning can justify review. On the material before it, no such apparent error was demonstrated in the earlier order and the petition was in substance an attempt to reargue the decided matter.

Conclusion: The review petition was not maintainable on the ground urged and was liable to be dismissed.

---