Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Central Excise

        2018 (5) TMI 201 - AT - Central Excise

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Successful appeal grants cenvat credit on rejected/spoiled inputs used in manufacturing process The appellant was successful in their appeal regarding the denial of cenvat credit on inputs rejected/spoiled at the job worker's premises and inputs ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Successful appeal grants cenvat credit on rejected/spoiled inputs used in manufacturing process

                            The appellant was successful in their appeal regarding the denial of cenvat credit on inputs rejected/spoiled at the job worker's premises and inputs short received due to waste/scrap generated at the job worker's end. The Tribunal held that the appellant is entitled to cenvat credit for both amounts as the inputs were used in the manufacturing process, aligning with relevant legal precedents. The original decision denying the cenvat credit was overturned, and the appellant was granted the credit with consequential relief.




                            Issues Involved:

                            1. Whether the cenvat credit of Rs. 6,00,613/- can be denied on inputs rejected/spoiled at the job worker's premises received back by the appellant.
                            2. Whether the cenvat credit of Rs. 67,16,069/- can be denied on inputs short received due to waste/scrap generated at the job worker's end.

                            Issue No. 1: Cenvat credit of Rs. 6,00,613/- denied on inputs rejected/spoiled at the job worker's premises received back by the appellant

                            The appellant argued that the inputs, which were later found to be rejects/spoiled, were sent for manufacturing to the job worker and used in the manufacturing process. Therefore, as per Rule 4(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules (CCR), 2004, they are entitled to avail cenvat credit. The appellant cited the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in Asahi India Safety Glass Limited vs. Union of India, which states that credit is to be allowed on inputs used in the final product, even if they are later found defective and rejected.

                            The Revenue countered that the appellant did not take permission as per Rule 4(6) of the CCR, 2004, and showed high wastage on rejects, thus not entitled to cenvat credit.

                            The Tribunal found that the appellant is entitled to cenvat credit on Rs. 6,00,613/- for inputs rejected/spoiled and received back, as the inputs were used in the manufacturing process. This aligns with the decision in Asahi India Safety Glass Limited, which emphasizes that credit should not be denied if inputs become waste during the manufacturing process.

                            However, a separate opinion by another member held that the appellant did not provide evidence of payment of duty on the rejected raw material, which was thrown in the scrap yard. The appellant was required to reverse the credit in the absence of such proof. The member upheld the Commissioner’s finding that the appellant is not entitled to cenvat credit on the rejected/spoiled inputs.

                            Upon difference of opinion, the third member agreed with the original decision, stating that the inputs were used in the manufacturing process and therefore, cenvat credit should not be reversed.

                            Issue No. 2: Cenvat credit of Rs. 67,16,069/- denied on inputs on account of generation of waste/scrap at the job worker's end

                            The appellant contended that the waste/scrap generated at the job worker's end was cleared on payment of duty, and thus, cenvat credit cannot be denied. They cited various decisions, including Mahindra Hinoday Industries Ltd., which support that cenvat credit is admissible on inputs contained in waste/scrap generated during manufacturing.

                            The Tribunal noted that there was no allegation in the show cause notice that the appellant did not comply with Rule 4(6) of the CCR, 2004. The CBEC Circular F.NO. B-4/7/2000-TRU clarified that cenvat credit is admissible on inputs contained in waste/scrap. The High Court of Allahabad in Balrampur Chini Mills Ltd. vs. Union of India also held that waste products are not manufactured goods.

                            The Tribunal concluded that the appellant is entitled to cenvat credit on Rs. 67,16,069/- for inputs used in waste/scrap generated at the job worker's end, as the issue has been settled by various decisions and the CBEC circular.

                            Majority Order:

                            In view of the majority decision, the appeal is allowed, and the appellant is entitled to avail the cenvat credit for both the amounts in question. The impugned order is set aside, and the appeal is allowed with consequential relief, if any.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found