Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2018 (4) TMI 439 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Validity of assessment reopening & addition of alleged bogus purchases upheld by ITAT based on credible info & lack of evidence. The ITAT upheld the validity of the assessment reopening and the addition of 12.5% of alleged bogus purchases. The decision was based on credible ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Validity of assessment reopening & addition of alleged bogus purchases upheld by ITAT based on credible info & lack of evidence.

                            The ITAT upheld the validity of the assessment reopening and the addition of 12.5% of alleged bogus purchases. The decision was based on credible information and the assessee's failure to provide adequate evidence. The ITAT affirmed the AO's actions, emphasizing the lack of genuine purchases and the presence of incriminating material. The ITAT concluded that the addition was justified, following a cautious approach in line with relevant case law.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Validity of reopening of assessment.
                            2. Addition of 12.50% of alleged bogus purchases.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Validity of Reopening of Assessment:
                            The assessee filed its return for A.Y. 2009-10 on 09.09.2009 declaring a total income of Rs. 30,551/-. The case was reopened under section 147 by issuing a notice under section 148 on 10.02.2014 based on information from the DGIT (Inv.), Mumbai, indicating the assessee was a beneficiary of accommodation entries from MVAT dealers involved in issuing bogus sale/purchase bills. The assessment was completed under section 143(3) read with section 147 on 27.02.2015, determining the total income at Rs. 5,06,750/- with an addition of Rs. 4,78,194/- for bogus purchases.

                            The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) upheld the validity of the reopening, stating that there was no prior assessment or reassessment for the year under consideration before the notice under section 148 was issued. The Supreme Court in ACIT vs. Rajesh Jhaveri Stock Brokers (P) Ltd. (291 ITR 500) clarified that "reason to believe" means cause or justification to suppose that income had escaped assessment. The AO had received credible information from DGIT(Inv.), Mumbai about the assessee's involvement in bogus purchases, justifying the reopening. The information from the Maharashtra Sales Tax Department was publicly available, confirming the AO's reasons were not based on mere suspicion. Thus, the reopening under section 148 was deemed valid.

                            2. Addition of 12.50% of Alleged Bogus Purchases:
                            During the assessment proceedings, the AO issued notices under section 133(6) to verify the genuineness of purchases, which were returned unserved. The assessee failed to provide adequate supporting evidence or produce the parties for verification. Consequently, the AO concluded the purchases were not genuine, rejected the books of accounts under section 145(3), and estimated the profit at 12.5% of the total non-genuine purchases of Rs. 38,25,554/-, resulting in an addition of Rs. 4,78,194/-.

                            The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) confirmed the AO's action. The ITAT noted that the AO had received tangible and cogent incriminating material indicating the assessee was a beneficiary of bogus purchase entries. The reopening was based on credible information, and the AO's belief that income had escaped assessment was justified. The ITAT referred to the Supreme Court's decision in CIT(A) Vs. Rajesh Jhaveri Stock Brokers P. Ltd, 291 ITR 500, which supports the AO's prima facie belief based on tangible material.

                            On the merits, the ITAT observed that the AO had made necessary inquiries, and the assessee failed to provide confirmations or produce the parties. There was no evidence of transportation of goods, and the suppliers were found to be non-existent. The ITAT upheld the addition, noting that mere preparation of documents could not counter the overwhelming evidence of bogus purchases. The ITAT referred to the Gujarat High Court's decision in N K Industries vs Dy CIT, which held that 100% of bogus purchases should be disallowed. However, considering the facts and circumstances, the ITAT followed the Gujarat High Court's decision in CIT vs Simit P. Sheth, holding that a disallowance of 12.5% of bogus purchases was appropriate.

                            Conclusion:
                            The ITAT dismissed the appeal, upholding the reopening of the assessment and the addition of 12.5% of the alleged bogus purchases. The order was pronounced in the open court on 26.03.2018.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found