Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the swaging of duty-paid MS tubes or pipes by use of dies amounts to manufacture under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Analysis: The process of swaging was found to impart folds and a permanent change in shape, form and user to the plane MS tube or pipe. The Court held that manufacture occurs when a process brings into existence a workpiece with a distinguishable identity and a change of lasting character. On the facts, the swaging machine with different dies produced profiles of a different shape and use, and the resulting product was not merely the same tube or pipe in a different length or form. The earlier decisions dealing with mere welding or change in size were held inapplicable on the facts.
Conclusion: Swaging amounts to manufacture under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and the assessee's challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: A process amounts to manufacture when it causes a permanent and distinguishable transformation in the article, bringing into existence a new product with a different identity, shape or user.