Prima facie manufacture and exemption under a notification led to partial pre-deposit relief, not complete waiver.

Prima facie, welding and swaging duty-paid MS pipes of different diameters was treated as manufacture in light of the prevailing Supreme Court ruling in Prachi Industries, and the demand was regarded as time-barred only in part after considering credit admissibility. The claim to exemption under Notification No. 56/2002-CE required closer examination and could not be finally resolved at the stay stage. Complete waiver of pre-deposit was therefore refused, but partial relief was granted by directing a deposit of Rs. 2 lakhs and staying recovery for the balance.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellant had made out a prima facie case for complete waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in a dispute concerning excisability of the manufacturing activity and eligibility to exemption under Notification No. 56/2002-CE.

Analysis: The activity of joining duty-paid MS pipes of different diameters by welding and swaging was held, for present purposes, to amount to manufacture in view of the prevailing Supreme Court ruling in Prachi Industries. The demand was treated as within time, and credit admissibility was also taken into account, leaving only a differential amount. However, the availability of exemption under Notification No. 56/2002-CE required closer scrutiny and could not be finally decided at the stay stage. On that basis, total waiver was declined, but partial relief was considered appropriate.

Conclusion: Complete waiver of pre-deposit was refused, but the appellant was directed to deposit Rs. 2 lakhs and was granted waiver and stay of recovery for the balance amount.

---