Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the goods detained under Section 129 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Kerala State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 should be released pending adjudication, and whether adjudication should be completed within a fixed time.
Analysis: The petition was decided by following an earlier Division Bench decision in an identical matter, under which expeditious completion of adjudication was directed and release of detained goods pending adjudication was permitted in terms of Rule 140(1) of the Kerala Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017. Applying that course, the competent authority was directed to complete the adjudication under Section 129 within one week from production of a copy of the judgment. It was also directed that if the petitioner complied with Rule 140(1), the detained goods were to be released forthwith.
Conclusion: The petitioner obtained a direction for prompt adjudication and conditional release of the detained goods.