High Court overturns order rejecting rectification application under Income-Tax Act, emphasizing personal hearing and natural justice.

The High Court quashed the order rejecting the petitioner's rectification application under Section 154 of the Income-Tax Act, 1961, due to the lack of a personal hearing, citing a violation of natural justice principles. The Court directed the Assessing Officer to reconsider the applications in light of relevant precedents and a circular issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. Emphasizing the importance of granting a personal hearing, especially to a retired employee, the Court instructed prompt disposal of the applications within four weeks after providing the petitioner with a personal hearing.

---

---

Issues Involved:
Challenge to order rejecting rectification application under Section 154 of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 without a personal hearing.

Analysis:
1. The petitioner, a retired employee of the State Bank of India, filed a petition challenging the order dated 2nd May, 2016 passed by the Assessing Officer rejecting her rectification application under Section 154 of the Income-Tax Act, 1961. The petitioner claimed that she was entitled to exemption under Section 10(10C) of the Act as an ex-SBI employee, citing a previous judgment by the Bombay High Court. The impugned order was passed without granting the petitioner a personal hearing, which was a breach of natural justice principles.

2. The High Court, after considering the petitioner's arguments, quashed and set aside the order dated 2nd May, 2016, as it was passed in violation of principles of natural justice. The Court directed the Assessing Officer to reconsider the petitioner's rectification applications dated 30th September, 2009 and 4th December, 2015, in light of the previous judgment and circular issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. The Assessing Officer was instructed to dispose of the rectification applications expeditiously, preferably within four weeks, after granting a personal hearing to the petitioner.

3. The Court emphasized the importance of granting a personal hearing to the petitioner, especially considering her status as a retired employee. The judgment concluded by disposing of the petition in the terms mentioned, without any order as to costs. This case highlights the significance of adhering to natural justice principles and ensuring a fair opportunity for individuals to present their case before administrative decisions are made in matters concerning taxation and exemptions under the Income-Tax Act, 1961.

---