Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the products emerging during the refining of crude vegetable oil, such as gums, soap stock, wax, muddy/liquid sludge and palm fatty acid distillate, were liable to Central Excise duty or were covered by exemption under Notification No. 89/1995-CE dated 18.05.1995.
Analysis: The dispute turned on whether the incidental products generated in the course of refining crude oil could be treated as manufactured excisable goods or as waste arising during the refining process. The Tribunal followed the Larger Bench view that the refining activity is undertaken to obtain refined oil by removing unwanted materials present in the crude oil, and that the incidental products are not the intended result of manufacture. It was held that the market value of such products is not determinative, and that the goods in question are in the nature of waste arising during manufacture rather than manufactured by-products. On that basis, they fall within the scope of the exemption notification.
Conclusion: The demand of duty was unsustainable and the assessees were entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 89/1995-CE.
Ratio Decidendi: Incidental materials arising from the refining of crude oil, when generated as waste in the course of the refining process and not as intended manufactured products, are not liable to excise duty and are covered by the relevant exemption notification.