Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Central Excise

        2018 (3) TMI 625 - HC - Central Excise

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Writ appeal partly allowed, finalizing assessments for specified periods The court partly allowed the writ appeal, rejecting the remand of the provisional assessment and confirming the finalization of assessments for the ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                          Writ appeal partly allowed, finalizing assessments for specified periods

                          The court partly allowed the writ appeal, rejecting the remand of the provisional assessment and confirming the finalization of assessments for the specified periods. The court upheld the finalization of provisional assessments based on the information provided by the assessee, emphasizing compliance with Rule 7 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 for separate block periods and rejecting the set off of gains against losses to prevent double benefits to the assessee.




                          Issues:
                          1. Challenge to Ext.P13 order for provisional assessments for two periods.
                          2. Interpretation of Rule 7 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 regarding provisional assessments.
                          3. Compliance with show cause notices for separate block periods.
                          4. Finalization of provisional assessments for different block periods.
                          5. Departure from show cause notices in finalization of assessments.
                          6. Remand for re-calculation of duty liability based on loss/gain for separate periods.
                          7. Set off of gains against losses in provisional assessments.

                          Issue 1: Challenge to Ext.P13 order for provisional assessments for two periods
                          The writ petition challenged the Ext.P13 order for provisional assessments made for two periods based on show cause notices. The assessments were finalized under Rule 7 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, for the periods specified in the notices. The appellant contended that the assessments were not in line with the statutory mandate of a six-month block period for provisional assessments under Rule 7.

                          Issue 2: Interpretation of Rule 7 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 regarding provisional assessments
                          The appellant argued that Rule 7 required provisional assessments to be carried out for a block period of six months, setting off gains against losses. However, the court held that Rule 7 only prescribed a six-month period for final assessment based on provisional returns filed monthly. The court rejected the argument for a block assessment and upheld the finalization of provisional assessments for the specified periods.

                          Issue 3: Compliance with show cause notices for separate block periods
                          The appellant contended that the finalization of assessments should adhere to the separate block periods mentioned in the show cause notices. The court found that the assessments were made in accordance with the periods specified in the notices, ensuring compliance with the six-month period for final assessment under Rule 7.

                          Issue 4: Finalization of provisional assessments for different block periods
                          The court reviewed the finalization of provisional assessments for different block periods and found that the assessments were conducted as per the information provided by the assessee. The court upheld the orders finalizing the assessments for the respective periods.

                          Issue 5: Departure from show cause notices in finalization of assessments
                          The appellant argued against departing from the show cause notices in finalizing the assessments. The court noted that the assessments were based on the information supplied by the assessee for the specified periods, in line with the requirements of Rule 7.

                          Issue 6: Remand for re-calculation of duty liability based on loss/gain for separate periods
                          The court addressed the remand made for re-calculation of duty liability based on loss/gain for separate periods. The appellant's argument against departing from the show cause notice was accepted, and the court emphasized the importance of adhering to the notice in finalizing assessments.

                          Issue 7: Set off of gains against losses in provisional assessments
                          The court rejected the appellant's contention for setting off gains against losses in provisional assessments, emphasizing that such set-offs could result in granting double benefits to the assessee. The court modified the order to reject the claim for set off and confirmed the finalization of provisional assessments for the specified periods.

                          In conclusion, the court partly allowed the writ appeal, modifying the judgment to reject the remand of the provisional assessment and confirming the finalization of assessments for the periods in question.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found