<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 625 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356922</link>
    <description>The court partly allowed the writ appeal, rejecting the remand of the provisional assessment and confirming the finalization of assessments for the specified periods. The court upheld the finalization of provisional assessments based on the information provided by the assessee, emphasizing compliance with Rule 7 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 for separate block periods and rejecting the set off of gains against losses to prevent double benefits to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2018 16:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 625 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356922</link>
      <description>The court partly allowed the writ appeal, rejecting the remand of the provisional assessment and confirming the finalization of assessments for the specified periods. The court upheld the finalization of provisional assessments based on the information provided by the assessee, emphasizing compliance with Rule 7 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 for separate block periods and rejecting the set off of gains against losses to prevent double benefits to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356922</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>