Tribunal partially allows appeal, directs verification of debtor balance, dismisses gross profit addition.

The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of Rs. 3.50 lakhs due to lack of corroborative evidence supporting the surrender during the survey. The issue of the difference in debtor balance was sent back to the Assessing Officer for verification, with the assessee directed to provide evidence for reconciliation. The addition of Rs. 5,732 as gross profit on shortage in stock was dismissed as not pressed during the appeal hearing.

---

---

Issues:
1. Addition of Rs. 3.50 lakhs on account of surrender during the survey.
2. Addition of Rs. 5,732 as gross profit on shortage in stock.
3. Addition of Rs. 76,363 due to difference in the account with Petroleum Service Centre.

Analysis:

Issue 1: Addition of Rs. 3.50 lakhs on account of surrender during the survey
The appeal was against the addition of Rs. 3.50 lakhs made by the Assessing Officer based on a statement by the partner during a survey. The assessee contended that there was no incriminating material supporting the surrender. The Tribunal noted that there was no corroborative evidence for the unaccounted purchases. It was highlighted that statements during surveys are not conclusive and need supporting evidence. Relying on previous court decisions, the Tribunal concluded that the addition lacked merit and deleted the amount.

Issue 2: Addition of Rs. 5,732 as gross profit on shortage in stock
During the appeal hearing, the assessee did not press this ground, leading to its dismissal as not pressed.

Issue 3: Addition of Rs. 76,363 due to difference in the account with Petroleum Service Centre
The Assessing Officer added Rs. 76,363 due to a difference in the debtor balance with Petroleum Service Centre. The assessee argued an arithmetical mistake and agreed to provide necessary verification. The Tribunal decided to send the issue back to the Assessing Officer for verification and directed the assessee to produce evidence for reconciliation. Ground No. 3 was allowed for statistical purposes.

In conclusion, the Tribunal partly allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, deleting the addition of Rs. 3.50 lakhs and sending the issue of the difference in debtor balance back for verification.

---