Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether refund under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 was admissible on deemed export treated as export.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that in the assessee's own earlier case, relief had already been granted on the same issue by following earlier Tribunal decisions and by distinguishing the contrary view relied upon by the Revenue. The order also noted that the relevant High Court decision on the subject had been followed in the assessee's favour in the earlier round. In these circumstances, the Tribunal treated the issue as covered by its own earlier decision and found no reason to take a different view.
Conclusion: Refund under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 was upheld and the Revenue's appeals were dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the assessee's own case on the same issue has been decided in its favour, and that view follows binding or consistently applied precedent, refund under Rule 5 cannot be denied merely because the Revenue relies on a contrary line of authority.