<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 801 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355380</link>
    <description>Refund under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 on deemed export treated as export was treated as covered by the assessee&#039;s own earlier case. The Tribunal noted that the earlier order had already granted relief by following prior Tribunal rulings and a High Court decision, while distinguishing the contrary view relied on by the Revenue. Finding no basis to depart from that consistent precedent, it upheld the refund and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2018 09:33:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 801 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355380</link>
      <description>Refund under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 on deemed export treated as export was treated as covered by the assessee&#039;s own earlier case. The Tribunal noted that the earlier order had already granted relief by following prior Tribunal rulings and a High Court decision, while distinguishing the contrary view relied on by the Revenue. Finding no basis to depart from that consistent precedent, it upheld the refund and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355380</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>