Penalty not adjudicated in excise order, requiring remand for fresh decision on the proposed penalty issue.

The show cause notice proposed penalty under Section 11AC and the connected excise rules, but the adjudicating authority's order confirmed duty without any discussion or finding on penalty. As the penalty issue had not been adjudicated at all, a fresh decision on penalty was required. The prior Tribunal finding on absence of suppression was also to be considered in the remand proceedings. The matter was therefore remanded to the adjudicating authority for a fresh adjudication limited to the penalty issue.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the penalty proposed under Section 11AC and the connected rules had been adjudicated by the original authority, and if not, whether the matter required remand for a fresh decision.

Issue (i): Whether the penalty proposed under Section 11AC and the connected rules had been adjudicated by the original authority, and if not, whether the matter required remand for a fresh decision.

Analysis: The show cause notice proposed penalty under Section 11AC read with Rule 25 of the Central Excise (No.1) Rules, 2001, Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 and Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The impugned order confirmed duty but contained no discussion or finding on the proposed penalty, so the penalty issue remained undecided by the adjudicating authority. In such a situation, a fresh adjudication on penalty was necessary, and the prior Tribunal order on absence of suppression was also required to be considered.

Conclusion: The penalty issue had not been adjudicated and the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision on penalty.

---