Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2017 (12) TMI 909 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal Overturns CIT(E) Order Canceling Society's Registration The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order of the CIT(E) that cancelled the registration of the assessee society under Section 12A. The ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal Overturns CIT(E) Order Canceling Society's Registration

                          The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order of the CIT(E) that cancelled the registration of the assessee society under Section 12A. The Tribunal found the society's activities genuine and aligned with its charitable objectives, emphasizing that the denial of cross-examination of key witnesses violated natural justice. The Tribunal held that the untested statement regarding money laundering allegations was insufficient to justify cancellation, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee society.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Cancellation of registration under Section 12A of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
                          2. Allegations of money laundering and ingenuine activities.
                          3. Denial of cross-examination of key witnesses.
                          4. Application of Section 68 of the Income-tax Act.
                          5. Utilization of donations for charitable purposes.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Cancellation of registration under Section 12A of the Income-tax Act, 1961:
                          The appeal concerns the cancellation of the assessee society's registration under Section 12A by the CIT(E), effective from 01.04.2010. The assessee society, established in 1965 and registered under Section 12A since 1973, was also enjoying exemption under Section 80G(5)(vi). The CIT(E) cancelled the registration based on a survey conducted under Section 133A at the premises of M/s. Herbicure Healthcare Bio-Herbal Research Foundation, where it was alleged that the assessee society was involved in money laundering activities.

                          2. Allegations of money laundering and ingenuine activities:
                          The CIT(E) relied on the statement of Shri Swapan Ranjan Dasgupta, founder Director of M/s. Herbicure, who admitted to accepting donations on behalf of M/s. Herbicure and returning the same to the donor after retaining a commission. The CIT(E) concluded that the assessee society was involved in money laundering based on a donation of Rs. 50 lacs received from M/s. Herbicure in AY 2011-12. The assessee society denied these allegations, stating that the donation was used for purchasing a building and was not a bogus donation.

                          3. Denial of cross-examination of key witnesses:
                          The assessee society requested to cross-examine Shri Swapan Ranjan Dasgupta and Shri Kishen Bhawshingka, as the entire case rested on their statements. The CIT(E) denied this request, citing various judgments. The Tribunal found this denial to be a violation of natural justice. The Supreme Court in the case of Andaman Timber Industries held that not allowing cross-examination of witnesses whose statements are the basis of an order is a serious flaw, rendering the order nullity.

                          4. Application of Section 68 of the Income-tax Act:
                          The Tribunal noted that even if the donation of Rs. 50 lacs was to be treated as unexplained under Section 68, no addition could be made since the assessee applied the entire amount for its charitable objectives. The Allahabad High Court in CIT Vs. Uttaranchal Welfare Society held that Section 68 does not apply where donations are disclosed as income and applied for charitable purposes.

                          5. Utilization of donations for charitable purposes:
                          The assessee society demonstrated that the donation from M/s. Herbicure was used for purchasing a property, aligning with its charitable objectives. The Tribunal emphasized that the assessee's activities were genuine and in accordance with its objectives. The CIT(E)'s reliance solely on the statement recorded during the survey, which lacks evidentiary value as per the Supreme Court's ruling in S. Kader Khan Sons, was insufficient to cancel the registration.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal concluded that the assessee society's registration under Section 12A could not be cancelled based on the untested statement of Shri Swapan Ranjan Dasgupta. The assessee's activities were found to be genuine and in accordance with its charitable objectives. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the order of the CIT(E) was set aside.

                          Order Pronouncement:
                          The appeal was allowed, and the order was pronounced in the open court on 06.09.2017.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found